Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/21293/2026 of JATINDER SHARMA ALIAS JATIN AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 24 July 2026
before the learned Magistrate and victim has not made any statement with regard to any compromise. Though victim was not initially ready for the compromise but he appeared before the Magistrate and made a statement that he along with his father has voluntarily entered into compromise with
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
POONAM 2026.07.28 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
appeared before the learned Magistrate and victim has not made any statement with regard to any compromise. Though victim was not initially ready for the compromise but he appeared before the Magistrate and made a statement that he along with his father has voluntarily entered into compromise with accused without any coercion or unwillingness and learned Magistrate has reported that the compromise between the parties is voluntary genuine and without any coercion or unwillingness. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondents have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed.
4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report.
5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and the private respondents are the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.
6. In view of the report of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all conse- quential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed, qua the petitioners.
7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 24th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.28 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document