Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/40681/2026 of SHARNJIT SINGH DHALIWAL Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 24 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 126 CRM-M-40681-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.07.2026 SHARNJIT SINGH DHALIWAL ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT

CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision: 24.07.2026

SHARNJIT SINGH DHALIWAL

... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

... RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:

None.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. No one has appeared as lawyers have suspended the work today.

2. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking a direction to respondent No.2 to ensure that respondent No.4 does not interfere with the peaceful use and plying of the petitioner's vehicle bearing registration No. PB-05-AJ-3871. Petitioner purchased the aforesaid vehicle after obtaining finance from respondent No.4. Two instalments are stated to be overdue and the musclemen of respondent No.4 are illegally obstructing the petitioner from plying the vehicle. Petitioner has submitted a representation dated 18.04.2026 to respondent No.2–Senior Superintendent of Police, Police District Jagraon, District Ludhiana.

3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2–Senior Superintendent of Police, Police District Jagraon, District Ludhiana, to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 18.04.2026 (Annexure P-2) by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.24 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, and to take appropriate action, if so warranted.

4. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law.

5. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 24.07.2026

JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.24 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead