Punjab and Haryana High Court

CWP/22489/2026 of JANGI LAL MAHAJAN AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CWP-22489-2026 Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 Jangi Lal Mahajan and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision: 23.07.2026

Jangi Lal Mahajan and others

....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

....Respondents

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL

Present:

Mr. A.D.S. Jattana, Advocate and

Mr. M.S. Gill, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

*****

DEEPAK SIBAL

, J (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Through this petition, the petitioners seek issuance of directions to the State to convene a meeting of the newly elected members of the Municipal Council, Mukerian so that oath of allegiance can be administered to them as also elections to the post of President and Vice-President(s) can be held.

2. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the meeting, as above, shall be convened within 10 days from today; the entire meeting and the venue from the outside, from all possible angles, shall be got videographed, which videography shall include the process of voting by the members by raising of hands; the CCTV/videographed material shall be preserved under the care and custody of Deputy Commissioner, Hoshiarpur DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.25 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh for a period of 06 months and that adequate security, if so required, shall also be made available where the afore meeting/elections are going to take place.

3. The afore statement made before us by learned State counsel satisfies learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 23.07.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.25 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead