Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/43711/2025 of NAVPREET SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Navpreet Singh State of Punjab and another Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-43711

IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG Navpreet Sing State of Punja

Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

Present Present Present Present:

SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO

2023 for canc dated 03.06.20 in case FIR N 2023, at Polic

2. the petitioner 03.06.2025, b withdraw the directions.

3.

4. July 23 July 23 July 23 July 23, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 mahavir Whether speak Whether report 1-2025

GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H

CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-43711

43711-2 gh

versus ab and another

ion: ion: ion: ion: July 23 July 23 July 23 July 23, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 ading: ading: ading: ading: July 23 July 23 July 23 July 23, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate for the Mr. Jaypreet Singh, DAG Punjab. ***** ***** ***** ***** OEL OEL OEL OEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed un cellation of anticipatory bail grante 025 (Annexure P-4) by learned Ad No.130 dated 17.05.2025, registered e Station Division No.8, Ludhiana. Learned counsel for the petitioner r is seeking cancellation of ant by learned Sessions Court at Lu present petition so as to approach Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shal

ing/reasoned: Yes/No table:

Yes/No

HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH

....Petitioner

....Respondents ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL petitioner.

nder Section 483(3) of the BNSS, ed to respondent No.2, vide order dditional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, d under Section 318(4) of the BNS, . r, at the outset, submits that since ticipatory bail, vide order dated udhiana, he may be permitted to the said Court for requisite relief/ ll also stand disposed of.

(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)

JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE

r s , r , , e d o / MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead