Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/42538/2025 of RAMESH CHAND THAKUR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 23 July 2026
-2- 2. Learned State Counsel on instructions from ASI Soha Singh has submitted that since vehicle of the petitioner is with the petitioner and they are using it and there is no hinderance in use of the vehicle. As such, nothing survives in the petition. 3. In view of the above, the present
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
POONAM 2026.07.24 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-42538-2025 (O&M) -2-
2. Learned State Counsel on instructions from ASI Soha Singh has submitted that since vehicle of the petitioner is with the petitioner and they are using it and there is no hinderance in use of the vehicle. As such, nothing survives in the petition.
3. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of .
4. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 23.07.2026 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No POONAM 2026.07.24 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document