Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/4342/2026 of HARDEEP SINGH MEMBER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 23 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Hardeep Singh Member State of Punjab Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-4342
IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG Hardeep Singh State of Punja
Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
Present Present Present Present:
SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO
Nagarik Surak anticipatory b registered for and 3(5) of the
2. GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-4342
4342-20
h Member
versus ab
ion: ion: ion: ion: July 23
July 23, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 ading: ading: ading: ading: July 23
July 23, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate and Ms. Meena, Advocate for the petiti Mr. Jaypreet Singh, DAG Punjab. ***** ***** ***** ***** OEL OEL OEL OEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed un ksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BN bail to the petitioner, in case offences punishable under Sectio e BNS, 2023, at Police Station Goi On 28.01.2026, the following orde “Present petition has been filed No.0518 dated 18.10.2025, registered 115(2) and 3(5) of BNS, registered at Tarn Taran. Learned counsel for the petit occurrence had took place on 19.09.2025 thereafter, i.e. on 18.10.2025. He subm levelled against the petitioner were e 13.11.2025, the allegations against the submits that no prima facie case is m deserves to be granted the concession of Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Ms. Ram notice on behalf of respondent-State. To come up on 18.03.2026.
HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH
....Petitioner
....Respondent ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL ioner. nder Section 482 of the Bhartiya NSS’) for grant of concession of FIR No.0518 dated 18.10.2025, ons 118(2), 117(2), 118(1), 115(2) indwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran. er was passed: ed seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR under Sections 118(2), 117(2), 118(1), Police Station Goindwal Sahib, District itioner has submitted that the alleged 25, however, the FIR was lodged 29 days mits that even otherwise the allegations enquired and vide G.D. No.22 dated e petitioner were found to be false. He made out against the petitioner and he f anticipatory bail. mta Chowdhary, D.A.G., Punjab, accepts
r t a f , ) R ), t d s s d e e s MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-4342
4342-2026
In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall join investigation before the Investigating Agency/Officer. He shall abide by the following conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023:-
(i) That the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.
(iii) That the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court.” ” ” ”
3. Learned State counsel (on instructions) has stated that pursuant to the order dated 28.01.2026, the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the record; especially in view of the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not being sought by the State; the interim order dated 28.01.2026 passed by this Court is made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.
5. Petition stands allowed allowed allowed allowed, accordingly.
6. This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read as granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence.
7. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 or upon showing any other sufficient cause.
8. Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case. MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-4342
4342-2026
9. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
July 23, , , , 2026
mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment