Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/40460/2026 of KARAN SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (128) CRM-M-40460-2026 Karan Singh ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 23.07.2026 Date of uploading: 23.07.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Akhil Saini, Advocate for

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-40460-2026

Karan Singh

……Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab

……Respondent(s)

Decided on : 23.07.2026

Date of uploading: 23.07.2026

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present:

Mr. Akhil Saini, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

*****

Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral):

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus:

“It is therefore respectfully prayed that keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances, the applicant may kindly be granted the concession of Interim Regular Bail u/s 483 of the BNSS, 2023 (Formally section u/s 439 CRPC) praying for the concession of interim regular bail in FIR No. 262 dated 23.10.2020 registered at P.S Sarhali, Tarn Taran, under section 302, 307, 447, 511, 148, 149 of IPC (BNSS Section 103(1), 109, 329(3), 62, 191(3), 190) and 25, 27 Arms Act (Annexure P-1), to the Petitioner for the period of 30 days, in view of the compelling circumstances where petitioner has to undergo surgical treatment for removal of retained bullet/pellet fragments from his chest, as advised by the doctors, subject to such/terms and conditions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, in the interest of justice.”

2. It is the conceded case before this Court that the petitioner, who is seeking interim regular bail for a period of 30 days on medical grounds, has not chosen to make such a plea before the concerned Sessions Court in the first instance. Despite a specific query put by this Court, no reason nay tangible reason NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.23 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-40460-2026

is forthcoming. The petition in hand is, thus, rejected, leaving liberty in favour of the petitioner to approach the concerned Sessions Court in the first instance, for the relief sought herein.

(SUMEET GOEL) July 23, 2026

JUDGE Naveen

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.23 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead