Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/25777/2026 of NAVNEET SINGLA Vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANR on 23 July 2026
(203 (203 (3333rdrdrdrd case)case)case)case) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Navneet Singla State of U.T., Chandigarh Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date
CRM
CRM
CRM
CRM-M-25777
203 (
203 (
203 (
203 (3rd
rd
rd
rd case)
case)
case)
case)
IN THE HIG
IN THE HIG
IN THE HIG
IN THE HIG
Navneet Singl
State of U.T.,
Date of Decis
Date of Decis
Date of Decis
Date of Decis
Date of Uploa
Date of Uploa
Date of Uploa
Date of Uploa
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
Present
Present
Present
Present:
SUMEET GO
SUMEET GO
SUMEET GO
SUMEET GO
p
2.
registered und
7-2026
GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
CRM
CRM
CRM
CRM-M-25777
25777-2
la
versus
Chandigarh and another
ion:
ion:
ion:
ion: July 23
July 23
July 23
July 23, 2026
ading:
ading:
ading:
ading: July
July
July
July 24
24, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE
Mr. Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate
Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecu
Mr. Shubham Mangla, A.P.P. U.T.
Mr. Arjun Garg, Advocate
for the respondent – U.T., Chandig
Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for
*****
*****
*****
*****
OEL
OEL
OEL
OEL, J. (ORAL)
, J. (ORAL)
, J. (ORAL)
, J. (ORAL)
The substantive prayer made in the
“It is, therefore, respectfully p
stated facts and circumstances, pres
and:
i)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
dated 08.08.2025 proclamation proceedings were init Order dated 06.11.2025 (Annexure P U.T. Chandigarh, whereby, the petiti in case (PCH-2289 of 2023) titled as of case F.I.R. No. 187, dated 13.07.2 (now Section 209 of BNS), registe (Annexure P-1), may kindly be qua between the parties in the main ca Negotiable Instruments Act, has bee Deed dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P- Since the FIR in question, i.e., der Section 174-A of IPC, at Poli
HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH
....Petitioner
....Respondents ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL for the petitioner. utor U.T., Chandigarh with ., Chandigarh and garh. r respondent No.2. e petition in hand reads thus: prayed that keeping in view the above sent petition may kindly be allowed (Annexure P-3), whereby, the tiated against the petitioner and the P-4), passed by Ld. Judicial Magistrate ioner was declared proclaimed person "State Vs. Navneet Singla" arisen out 2023, under Section 174-A of the IPC tered at P.S. Sector 36, Chandigarh ashed/set aside as the entire dispute case filed under Section 138 of the en amicably settled vide Compromise -6), in the interest of justice.” , FIR No.187 dated 13.07.2023, ice Station Sector 36, Chandigarh
r s e d e e e n t C h e e e , h MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.24 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-25777
25777-2026
stands quashed vide order of even date passed in CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-25807 25807 25807 25807-2026
2026, the petition in hand has been rendered infructuous.
3. Ordered accordingly.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE July 23 July 23 July 23 July 23, 2026
mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.24 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment