Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/25065/2026 of MOHD ABDUL KHAN Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Petitioner no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in custody any longer. 6. Per contra, learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. 8. The petitioners are in custody since

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

…..Petitioner

r REKHA SHARMA 2026.07.24 05:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

REKHA SHARMA 2026.07.24 05:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

REKHA SHARMA 2026.07.24 05:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in custody any longer.

6. Per contra, learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail.

7. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

8. The petitioners are in custody since 04.01.2026; investigation stands completed; final report also stands submitted; charges have not yet been framed. The petitioners have clean antecedents. Since the trial shall take a sufficiently long time, in the considered opinion of this Court, no useful REKHA SHARMA 2026.07.24 05:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in custody any longer.

9. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petitions are allowed. The petitioners are ordered to be released on regular bail on their furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

Rekha

REKHA SHARMA 2026.07.24 05:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead