Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/28158/2026 of BHUPINDER SINGH @ BHINDA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 23 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Bhupinder Singh @ Bhinda State of Punjab Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-28158
IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG Bhupinder Sin State of Punja
Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
Present Present Present Present:
SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO
Nagarik Surak anticipatory b for offences p 1985, at Polic
2. j 8-2026
GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-28158
28158-2 ngh @ Bhinda
versus ab
ion: ion: ion: ion: July 23
July 23, 2026
ading: ading: ading: ading: July 23
July 23, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE None for the petitioner. Mr. Jaypreet Singh, DAG Punjab. ***** ***** ***** ***** OEL OEL OEL OEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed un ksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BN bail to the petitioner, in case FIR N punishable under Sections 21-(B), 2 e Station Cantonment, District Am On 25.05.2026, the following orde “Learned counsel appearing o contends that the petitioner has been no statement made by the other co-accuse heroin has been recovered. He further c establish connection of the petitioner wit that no recovery of any nature whatsoev and that he is ready and willing to join and to extend all cooperation to the Inves Notice of motion. Mr. Mohit Ka behalf of respondent-State and contends against the petitioner for commission o disputed that the petitioner has been array basis of disclosure statements and no rec effected from the petitioner, at this stage, Adjourned to 23.07.2026. Reply, if any, be filed in the m Counsel opposite. In the meanwhile, the petitioner when so required by the Investigating joining the investigation, he shall be ad officer/investigating officer on his fu satisfaction of the arresting officer/inve
HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH
....Petitioner
....Respondent ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL
nder Section 482 of the Bhartiya NSS’) for grant of concession of No.53 dated 03.04.2026, registered 27(A), 29/ 61 85 of the NDPS Act, mritsar. er was passed: on behalf of the petitioner inter alia ominated as an accused on the disclosure ed from whose possession 06 grams of contends that there is no link evidence to ith the said recovery. He further contends ver has been effected from the petitioner the investigation as and when called for stigating Agency. apoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab accepts notice on that there are three other FIRs registered of similar offences. It is, however, not ayed as an accused in the said FIRs on the covery of any nature whatsoever had been e, pursuant to such disclosures. meanwhile with copy in advance to the er is directed to join investigation as and Agency. In the event of the petitioner admitted to interim bail by the arresting furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the estigating officer. The petitioner(s) shall
r t a f d , a e f o s r r n d t e n e d r g e ll MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-28158
28158-2026
also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) of 2023.” ” ” ”
3. Learned State counsel (on instructions) has stated that pursuant to the order dated 25.05.2026, the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the State and upon perusal of the record; especially in view of the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not being sought by the State; the interim order dated 25.05.2026 passed by this Court are made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.
5. Petition stands allowed allowed allowed allowed, accordingly.
6. This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read as granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence.
7. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 or upon showing any other sufficient cause.
8. Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.
9. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
July 23, 2026
mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment