Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/31657/2026 of SHAMSHER SINGH @ MONU RANA Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 23 July 2026
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 236 CRM-M-31657-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.07.2026 Date of uploading :24.07.2026 SHAMSHER SINGH @ MONU RANA ………….Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA …….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision : 23.07.2026
Date of uploading :24.07.2026
SHAMSHER SINGH @ MONU RANA
………….Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
…….Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present:
Mr. Parth Aneja, Advocate for
Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana.
---
SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)
CRM-25280-2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Application in hand has been filed for grant of interim bail to the applicant-petitioner for a period of 90 days on medical grounds.
2. Learned counsel has pressed the prayer for grant of interim regular bail to the petitioner for his medical treatment, as he is suffering from paralysis of the bilateral lower limbs with bowel and bladder involvement along with chronic bed sores. His sensory reflexes are absent below the level of the nipples, and a Foley's catheter is present. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while pressing the aforesaid prayer for interim regular bail, has argued that the petitioner was earlier also granted the concession of interim regular bail vide order dated 21.01.2026 passed in CRM-M-72641-2025, and the said concession has not been misused till JATIN
date.
3. Learned State counsel has submitted that the State is providing the requisite medical treatment to the petitioner while he is in custody and, thus, there is no requirement to grant him interim regular bail at this stage.
4. I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the available records of the case.
5. Keeping in view the entirety of the factual milieu of the case in hand; especially the medical condition of the petitioner, it not being denied that he requires regular medical treatment, the fact that he had earlier been granted the concession of interim regular bail vide order dated 21.01.2026 passed in CRM-M-72641-2025 which concession was not misused; this Court is inclined to grant interim regular bail to the petitioner for a period of three months from the date of his release, subject to such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the concerned Illaqa Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate while releasing him on bail. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, the petitioner shall remain bound by the following conditions:-
(i) The petitioner shall not mis-use the liberty granted.
(ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence, oral or documentary, during the trial.
(iii) The petitioner shall not absent himself on any date before the trial.
(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.
(v) The petitioner shall deposit his passport, if any, with the trial Court.
(vi) The petitioner shall give his cell-phone number to the Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and shall not change his cell-phone number without prior permission of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate. JATIN
(vii) The petitioner shall not in any manner try to delay the trial.
6. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those which may be imposed by concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate as directed hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
7. Ordered accordingly.
8. Nothing said hereinabove shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. CRM-M-31657-2026
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, does not want to press the prayer for regular bail at this stage.
2. Resultantly, the prayer for regular bail is dismissed as not pressed. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 23.07.2026 jatin Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No JATIN