Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8755/2026 of PRIYANKA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 23 July 2026
of 2026(O&M) -2- 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4. Mr. Aakash Yadav, AAG Punjab, who is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and submits that petitioner’s representation was received and was being looked into. 5. The petition is
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
REEMA SAINI 2026.07.27 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
CRWP-8755 of 2026(O&M) -2-
3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.
4. Mr. Aakash Yadav, AAG Punjab, who is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and submits that petitioner’s representation was received and was being looked into.
5. The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to official respondents to decide representation dated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-
2) within a period of one month. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner, necessary steps warranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioner. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE 23.07.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No REEMA SAINI 2026.07.27 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh