CRM-M/26830/2026 of PARVEEN AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 23 July 2026

IN

Parveen and

State of Har

CORAM: H

Present:

Shalini Sing

under Sectio Bhupani, Di arising there arrived at bet

2. learned trial regard to com

3. learned Judic Statement of Station Bhup 830-2026 (O&M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIGA d others

VERSUS ryana and another

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocat Mr. Kshitij Bharati, AAG, Hary

Mr. Rohit Kumar Rana, Advoca Ms. Kajal Chauhan, Advocate fo

**** gh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Petitioners seek quashing of ons 351(3), 191(2), 190, 117(2 istrict Faridabad, Haryana, an from, on the basis of comprom tween the parties. On 13.05.2026, this Court direc Court/Illaqa Magistrate for rec mpromise. In compliance of the aforesaid cial Magistrate Ist Class, Farida f Investigating officer- ASI V pani, Faridabad, was also reco

NJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRM-M-26830-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:23.07.2026

…Petitioners

...Respondents LINI SINGH NAGPAL te for the petitioners. yana. ate and or respondents No.2 to 6. FIR No.33 dated 05.03.2026, 2), 115 of BNS, Police Station nd all subsequent proceedings mise dated 02.05.2026 said to be cted the parties to appear before cording of their statements with d order, parties appeared before abad, on 20.05.2026/25.05.2026. Vijnder Kumar, No.643, Police orded on 25.05.2026. Learned

)

s s , n s e e h e . e d KAPIL

Judicial Mag satisfaction t any influence submitted: 830-2026 (O&M) gistrate Ist Class, Faridabad, has that all the parties have entered i e or coercion. The relevant part “1. Total number of persons f dispute/FIR Report: As per statement of persons namely Pa and Babita in the pr

2. Number of complainant/v Report: As per statement o namely Chaman La Ekta, Santosh, Kam case.

3. Whether all the accused party to the compromise a Report: Yes, all the accus are party to the com

4. In case, any affected pers left out or not arrayed as before High Court, detail Report: As per statement o (complainant/victim arrayed as party i Hon'ble High Court s submitted his report recording into a valid compromise without of the report as under has been found involved as accused in the of IO, there are only five accused Parveen, Umesh, Pawan, Suman present FIR. victims(s) of IO, there is one complainant Lal & four other victims namely amla and Rajeev in the present d and complainant/victims are and signed the same. sed and complainant/victims(s) mpromise. rson (accused or complainant) is as party in the quashing petition l whereof; of IO, all the effected persons ms and accused persons) are in the quashing petition before rt.

g t n e d n t y t e ) s n s e e KAPIL

4. to 6 have not the matter proceedings w

5. Judgment of and another “Gian Singh petition is all 830-2026 (O&M)

5. Whether any accused has offender/person or any su have been initiated or pen Report: As per statement of has been delcared a nor any such proce been initiated or pe

6. Report of the Court wh voluntary and without any Report: From the statement the court, it appe effected is for th dispute and has bee pressure, undue inf a valid/genuine com

7. Any other aspect relevant Report: No.”

Learned State counsel and learn t raised any dispute regarding th has been amicably resolved, would be an exercise in futility. Following principles of law l this Court in “Kulwinder Singh ” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 h Versus State of Punjab and o lowed.

s been delcared as a proclaimed uch proceedings against him/her nding adjudication. of IO, neither any accused person as a proclaimed offender/person eedings against any of them has ending adjudication. hether compromise is genuine, y coercoin or undue influence. nts of the parties suffered before pears that the compromise so he amicable settlement of the en effected without any external fluence, coercion or force and is mpromise. t to the present case. ed counsel for respondents No.2 he factum of compromise. Since continuation of the criminal

laid down by the Full Bench h and others Vs. State of Punjab 2 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in others” (2012) 10 SCC 303, the

d r n n s , e o e l s e l h b n e KAPIL

6. 351(3), 191( Faridabad, H quashed qua

7. 23.07.2026 Kapil 830-2026 (O&M) Consequently, FIR No.33 date (2), 190, 117(2), 115 of BNS, P Haryana, and all consequential pr the petitioners, on the basis of c Pending applications, if any, stan

Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable :

ed 05.03.2026, under Sections Police Station Bhupani, District roceedings arising therefrom, are ompromise dated 02.05.2026. nd disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE

Yes/No

Yes/No

s t e

) KAPIL