Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/29708/2026 of SUKHPREET SINGH ALIAS RAJU AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 23 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sukhpreet Singh alias Raju and another State of Punjab Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-29708
IN THE HI IN THE HIG IN THE HI IN THE HIG Sukhpreet Sin State of Punja
Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
Present Present Present Present:
SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO
Nagarik Surak anticipatory b for offences p Police Station
2. p 8-2026
GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-29708
29708-2 ngh alias Raju and another
versus ab
ion: ion: ion: ion: July 23
July 23, 2026
ading: ading: ading: ading: July 23
July 23, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Jaypreet Singh, DAG Punjab. ***** ***** ***** ***** OEL OEL OEL OEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed un ksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BN bail to the petitioners, in case FIR N punishable under Sections 331(4), n Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) On 25.05.2026, the following orde “Apprehending their arrest in Sections 331(4), 305, 61(2) of BNS 2023 registered at Police Station Majitha, D have preferred this petition under Secti Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. Counsel for the petitioners, inter been falsely implicated into the FIR prosecution version available at this junc are alleged to have stolen utensils; the pe & are willing to join investigation and co Notice of motion. On the strength of advance noti Punjab has entered appearance on behalf Adjourned to 23.07.2026. The petitioners are directed to ap 29.05.2026 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned the event of arrest, the petitioners shall b furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to Officer/Investigating Officer. As and Officer, the petitioners shall join the condition(s) enumerated under Section Sanhita, 2023.” ” ” ”
HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH
....Petitioners
....Respondent ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL r the petitioners.
nder Section 482 of the Bhartiya NSS’) for grant of concession of No.65 dated 28.04.2026, registered , 305, 61(2) of the BNS, 2023, at ). er was passed: n FIR No. 65 dated 28.04.2026 under 3 (Section 457, 380, 120-B of IPC 1860), District Amritsar (Rural), the petitioners tion 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha er alia, contends that the petitioners have R in question; assuming arguendo, the cture is taken to be correct, the petitioners etitioners are men with clean antecedents ooperate therein as per law. tice; Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. AG, f of the respondent-State of Punjab. appear before the Investigating Officer on d Police Station and join investigation. In be released on interim bail subject to their to the satisfaction of the Arresting when further called by Investigating investigation. They shall abide by the n 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
s t a f d t r ), s a e e s s G, n n r g g e a MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-29708
29708-2026
3. Learned State counsel (on instructions) has stated that pursuant to the order dated 25.05.2026, the petitioners have joined investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the record; especially in view of the factum of the petitioners having joined investigation and their custodial interrogation is not being sought by the State; the interim order dated 25.05.2026 passed by this Court are made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.
5. Petition stands allowed allowed allowed allowed, accordingly.
6. This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read as granting petitioners indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence.
7. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioners violate any condition stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 or upon showing any other sufficient cause.
8. Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.
9. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
July 23, 2026
mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment