Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8718/2026 of NISHU AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 23 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8718-2026 Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 NISHU AND ANOTHER ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Mandeep Kumar Dhot, Advocate, for the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8718-2026
Date of Decision: 23.07.2026
NISHU AND ANOTHER
......... Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present :
Mr. Mandeep Kumar Dhot, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents Nos. 2 & 3 to ensure protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and not to interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioners.
2. Notice of motion to official respondents only.
3. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, learned Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents Only. He submitted that statements of private respondents i.e. respondent No.4-Gulab Singh, respondent No.5-Sunder and respondent No.6-Ravinder were recorded. He has produced copy of statements today in the Court, which is taken on record.
4. Counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.23 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document statements of respondents No.4 to 6, he does not want to proceed further with the instant petition and intends to withdraw the same.
5. In view of this, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 23.07.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.23 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document