CRM-M/29966/2026 of SUHAIL ALIAS KEENU Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 23 July 2026

CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-29966

IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG Suhail alias K State of Harya

Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

Present Present Present Present:

SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO

Nagarik Surak anticipatory b for offences p BNS, 2023 ( 191(3), 190 of

2. 6-2026

GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H

CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-29966

29966-2 Keenu

versus ana

ion: ion: ion: ion: July 23

July 23, 2026

ading: ading: ading: ading: July 23

July 23, 2026

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE Mr. Kapil Aggarwal, Advocate for Ms. Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior Mr. Harjot Singh Bedi, Advocate f ***** ***** ***** ***** OEL OEL OEL OEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed un ksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BN ail to the petitioner, in case FIR N punishable under Sections 351(3), challan filed under Sections 115 f the BNS), at Police Station Chand On 25.05.2026, the following orde “Apprehending his arrest in FIR for the offences punishable under Secti BNS (sections 506, 153, 149, 339, 324, 3 filed under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 1 (Sections 323, 324, 339, 506, 307, 148 Bagh, District Panipat.; the petitioner h 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh Counsel for the petitioner, inter a falsely implicated into the FIR in questio PW-Salman has turned hostile & the peti cooperate therein as per law. Notice of motion.

HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH

....Petitioner

....Respondent ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL r the petitioner. r DAG Haryana. for the complainant. nder Section 482 of the Bhartiya NSS’) for grant of concession of o.582 dated 24.08.2025, registered 192, 190, 126, 118(1), 115 of the (2), 118(1), 126, 351(3), 109(1), dni Bagh, District Panipat. er was passed: IR No. 582 dated 24.08.2025, registered tions 351(3), 192, 190, 126, 118(1), 115 321 IPC) and later on challan/final report 126, 351(3), 109(1), 191(3), 190 BNS 48, 149 IPC), at Police Station Chandni has preferred this petition under Section hita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. alia, contends that the petitioner has been on, the prime prosecution witness namely titioner is willing to join investigation and

r t a f d e , d t S i n n y d MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment

CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-29966

29966-2026

On the strength of advance notice; Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG, Haryana has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent-State of Haryana. At this juncture; Mr. Harjot Singh Bedi, Advocate has caused appearance on behalf of the FIR-complainant and has ratified the aspect of the prime prosecution witness namely FIR-complainant Salman having turned hostile. Adjourned to 23.07.2026. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 29.05.2026 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join investigation. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when further called by Investigating Officer, the petitioner shall join the investigation. He shall abide by the condition(s) enumerated under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.” ” ” ”

3. Learned State counsel (on instructions SI Nepal Singh) has stated that pursuant to the order dated 25.05.2026, the petitioner has joined investigation, but his custodial interrogation is required only for effecting recovery of sua/ ice breaker.

4. Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the grant of petition in hand by arguing that there are direct/ serious allegations against the petitioner. It has been contended that, in case, the petitioner is granted the concession of anticipator bail, there is all likelihood that he may abscond from the process of justice as also interfere with the prosecution evidence/ witnesses. On the strength of these submissions, dismissal of the petition in hand is entreated for.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the record; especially in view of the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation, but his custodial interrogation is being sought only for effecting recovery of sua/ ice breaker; the interim order dated 25.05.2026 passed by this Court are made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6. Petition stands allowed allowed allowed allowed, accordingly. MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment

CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-29966

29966-2026

7. This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read as granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence.

8. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 or upon showing any other sufficient cause.

9. Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.

10. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)

JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE

July 23, 2026

mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.23 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment