Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/22645/2026 of SUNILPAL SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 23 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 120 CWP-22645-2026 Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 Sunilpal Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. S.P.S. Aulakh,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 23.07.2026
Sunilpal Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present:
Mr. S.P.S. Aulakh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
*****
DEEPAK SIBAL
, J (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 – Electoral Registration Officer-cum-Sub Division Magistrate, Ajnala, to take a decision on the application dated 12.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) filed by the petitioner.
2. Learned State counsel has no objection if the petitioner’s above prayer is accepted.
3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to take a decision on the aforesaid application filed by the petitioner, by passing speaking order(s) and after granting opportunity of hearing to all DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.25 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh affected parties within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 23.07.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.25 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh