Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/36484/2026 of SOUVIK SENGUPTA Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 23 July 2026
(O & M) ::1:: (226) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36484-2026 (O & M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 Souvik Sengupta ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Arshdeep Singh Cheema,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
::1::
(226) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-36484-2026 (O & M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 Souvik Sengupta ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Arshdeep Singh Cheema, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. The prayer in the present petition under Section 483 BNSS is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.53 dated 08.05.2026 under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 61 of BNS, 2023 (corresponding Sections 409, 420 and 120-B of IPC) registered at Police Station Sector-5 Panchkula.
2. The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner contends that co- accused namely Prahalad Krishnamurti, Sachin Aggarwal and Gulshan Kaushik have surrendered and have been granted the concession of bail after VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.24 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
::2:: providing all the necessary documents to the Investigating Agency. The petitioner happens to be a Non-executive Director. As he is in custody since 03.06.2026, he be granted the concession of regular bail.
3. The counsel for the State does not dispute the factual contention that 03 accused including Prahalad Krishnamurti, who is the primary accused have already been granted the concession of police bail, that the petitioner is a Non-executive Director and that he is in custody since 03.06.2026.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
5. The veracity of the prosecution case against the petitioner and his co-accused shall be adjudicated upon during the course of the Trial. Admittedly, the petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2026. In this situation, the further incarceration of the petitioner is not required.
6. Thus without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner-Souvik Sengupta is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned CJM/Duty Magistrate, concerned.
7. The petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE July 23, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable :- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.24 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document