Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/40085/2026 of SANDEEP KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS on 23 July 2026
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 129 CRM-M-40085-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 SANDEEP KUMAR ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. B.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT
CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 23.07.2026
SANDEEP KUMAR
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
Mr. B.S. Mamli, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Karanveer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS/Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking directions to the respondents/police officials to take legal against against the private respondents and to register an FIR against the private respondents.
2. After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner submitted a representation dated 19.05.2026 (Annexure P-9) to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad, and he would be satisfied if appropriate direction be issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad, to consider and decide representation dated 19.05.2026 (Annexure P-9) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.23 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
4. Mr. Karanveer Singh, learned Sr. DAG, Haryana who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits the needful would be done in due course.
5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad, to decide the representation dated 19.05.2026 (Annexure P-
9) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required.
6. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law.
7. Petition stands disposed of.
8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 23.07.2026
JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.23 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document