Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/8671/2026 of POOJA KUMARI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 22 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8671-2026 Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 POOJA KUMARI AND ANOTHER ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Mikhail Kad, Advocate, for the petitioners.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-8671-2026

Date of Decision: 22.07.2026

POOJA KUMARI AND ANOTHER

......... Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

..... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present :

Mr. Mikhail Kad, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL

, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents Nos. 2 & 3 to ensure protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and not to interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioners.

2. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners today. Pursuant to advance notice, Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned State counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that the State authorities contacted petitioner No. 1, Pooja Kumari, and recorded her statement. As per the said statement, she is not facing any threat to her life or liberty and does not require any police protection. A copy of the statement of petitioner No. 1-Pooja Kumari, has been produced before the Court today and is taken on record. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.23 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

3. In view of the statement made by petitioner No. 1-Pooja Kumari, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

4. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 22.07.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.23 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead