Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/23818/2026 of SURESH MEHTO Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 22 July 2026
months and 10 days. The quantity of contraband allegedly recovered was non-commercial. Investigation of the case was complete and trial would take long to conclude, therefore, the petitioner deserved to be enlarged on regular bail. 4. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
REEMA SAINI
CRM-M-23818 of 2026(O&M) months and 10 days. The quantity of contraband allegedly recovered was non-commercial. Investigation of the case was complete and trial would take long to conclude, therefore, the petitioner deserved to be enlarged on regular bail.
4. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail submitting that in case of release on bail, petitioner was likely to commit similar offence and considering the gravity of allegations, his petition be dismissed. Custody certificate filed is taken on record.
5. Petitioner is behind bars w.e.f. 25.10.2025. His antecedents are clean and he is not involved in any other case. The quantity of contraband allegedly recovered from petitioner is non-commercial, hence, rigours of Section 37 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, are not attracted. Investigation of the case is complete and charges have been framed.
6. The often invoked phrase ‘Bail is the rule and jail is the exception’ is not merely an empty statutory slogan flowing from the Cr.P.C. It is a constitutional principle flowing from Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution and the presumption of innocent which is the cornerstone of any civilised society governed by the rule of law. (Vide Syed Iftikhar Andrabi Vs. National Investigation agency 2026 SCC online SC 881).
7. Considering the nature and substance of allegations against the petitioner, his clean antecedents, the period of incarceration and all relevant facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting on merits, petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing REEMA SAINI
CRM-M-23818 of 2026(O&M) adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE 22.07.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
REEMA SAINI