Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/22041/2026 of RANJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 22 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 123 CRM-M-22041-2026(O&M) Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 Ranjit Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present:-. Mr. P.P.S. Brar, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 123
CRM-M-22041-2026(O&M)
Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 Ranjit Singh and another ...Petitioners
Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present:-. Mr. P.P.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab.
***** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J.(Oral)
Prayer in the petition under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to take legal action against the private respondent.
In compliance to order dated 05.05.2026 of this Court, affidavit of Senior Superintendent of Police, District Moga has been filed by learned State counsel, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that FIR has been registered on complaint of the petitioners and the petition has become infructuous.
The petition is dismissed having become infructuous.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE
22.07.2026
Kapil
Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No KAPIL 2026.07.22 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document