Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/39994/2026 of VED PARKASH Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 22 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.39994 of 2026 Date of decision: 22.07.2026 Ved Parkash …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present :- Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** H.S.GREWAL, J.
102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.39994 of 2026
Date of decision: 22.07.2026
Ved Parkash
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present :-
Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate
for the petitioner.
*****
H.S.GREWAL, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 BNS (erstwhile 428 Cr.P.C,) for seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR bearing No.263 dated 09.06.2026 under Section 209 BNS (174-A IPC) registered at Police Station Sector 17, Huda, Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already surrendered before the trial Court on 02.07.2026 and was granted bail by the said Court.
3. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed. The bail granted to the petitioner by the trial Court on 02.07.2026 is made absolute, on the same terms and conditions.
(H.S.GREWAL) 22.07.2026
JUDGE Seema
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No SEEMA SHARMA 2026.07.24 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment