Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/8700/2026 of GURMINDER SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS on 22 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 109 CRWP-8700-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 GURMINDER SINGH ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Parambir Singh, Advocate and Ms. Parminder

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT

CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision: 22.07.2026

GURMINDER SINGH

... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

... RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:

Mr. Parambir Singh, Advocate and

Ms. Parminder Kaur, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of private respondents No.5 and 6.

2. After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner submitted a representation dated 18.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Mini Secretatiat, Chandigarh Road, Hoshiarpur, Punjab and he would be satisfied if appropriate direction be issued to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Mini Secretatiat, Chandigarh Road, Hoshiarpur, Punjab to consider and decide representation dated 18.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law.

3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.22 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits the needful would be done in due course.

5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Mini Secretatiat, Chandigarh Road, Hoshiarpur, Punjab to decide the representation dated 18.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required.

6. However, if, respondent No.3 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law.

7. Petition stands disposed of.

8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 22.07.2026

JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.22 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead