Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/8656/2026 of DHANVEER SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER on 22 July 2026
(O&M) -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 16.02.2026 passed by the Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Om Parkash states that the petitioner has
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
POONAM 2026.07.24 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-8656-2026 (O&M) -2-
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 16.02.2026 passed by the Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation.
4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Om Parkash states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation.
5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 16.02.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 22nd July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.24 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document