Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/39977/2026 of ANITA PANDAY Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 22 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39977-2026 Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 ANITA PANDEY .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-39977-2026
Date of Decision: 22.07.2026
ANITA PANDEY
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed under section 528 of BNSS, 2023
(482) of Cr.P.C) seeking issuance of appropriate direction directing the official respondents to conduct fair, impartial and effective investigation in FIR No.124 dated 10.11.2025 (Annexure P-1) registered under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [corresponding to Section 420 IPC] at Police Station Meharban, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana by nominating remaining accused persons i.e. respondent Nos.8 to 14, addition of appropriate penal offences including Sections 336, 338 and 340 BNS [463, 467, 470 of IPC] and for taking necessary coercive action including arrest of the accused persons and further direction may kindly be made to the official respondents to decide the detailed representation dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-2) submitted by the petitioner to the official respondent. RENU RAWAT 2026.07.23 14.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.3- Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.3- Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana to look into his representation dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-2) and take appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion to the official respondents.
4. At the asking of the Court, Mr.P.S.Pandher, Asst. A.G.Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3- Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana to consider and decide the representation dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass an appropriate order.
(H.S.GREWAL) 22.07.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.23 14.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh