Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/22124/2026 of TEJBIR ALIAS TEJBIR SINGH Vs ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 22 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.132 CWP-22124-2026 Date of decision : 22.07.2026 Tejbir @ Tejbir Singh .…. Petitioner Versus Election Commissioner of India and others ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.132
CWP-22124-2026
Date of decision : 22.07.2026
Tejbir @ Tejbir Singh
.…. Petitioner
Versus
Election Commissioner of India and others
..... Respondents
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present :
Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
* * * * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 to take a decision on the representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) submitted by the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted.
3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 to take a decision on the representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) submitted by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
[DEEPAK SIBAL]
JUDGE
22.07.2026
[RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL] shamsher
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.07.27 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh