Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/38879/2026 of AJAY KUMAR ALIAS KALA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 22 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

-:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (235) CRM-M-38879-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:22.07.2026 AJAY KUMAR ALIAS KALA … Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ... Respondent -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Ms. Nisha Rana, Advocate for the

-:1:-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

(235)

CRM-M-38879-2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision:22.07.2026

AJAY KUMAR ALIAS KALA

… Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB

... Respondent

-.-

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:-

Ms. Nisha Rana, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG, Punjab.

-.-

VIRINDER AGGARWAL

, J

. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present second petition has been instituted under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), seeking the concession of regular bail in connection with FIR No. 19 dated 11.02.2025, registered under Sections 109, 61(2), 3(5) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Sections 307, 120-B, 34 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860), at Police Station Banur, District Patiala, Punjab (Annexure P-1). It is not in dispute that the petitioner's earlier petition for regular bail was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 11.03.2026. GAURAV SOROT 2026.07.22 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-:2:-

2. At the very outset, and after addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition, at this stage.

2.1. Allowed as prayed for.

3. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. In view of the withdrawal and consequent disposal of the present petition, all pending miscellaneous applications, if any, arising out of or ancillary to the present proceedings, shall also stand disposed of. No separate or further orders are called for in respect thereof.

( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 22.07.2026

JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2026.07.22 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead