Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/33996/2025 of RAVINDER DAHIYA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER on 22 July 2026
(O&M) -2- parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private re- spondent has also made statement to the effect that he would
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
POONAM 2026.07.23 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-33996-2025 (O&M) -2- parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private re- spondent has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed.
4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report.
5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and the private respondent is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.
6. In view of the report of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Chandigarh, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed, qua the petitioners.
7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 22nd July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.23 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document