Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/38216/2026 of GURPREET @ GOPI Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HHHHIIIIGGGGHHHH CCCCOOOOUUUURRRRTTTT OOOOFFFF PPPPUUUUNNNNJJJJAAAABBBB AAAANNNNDDDD HHHHAAAARRRRYYYYAAAANNNNAAAA AAAATTTT CCCCHHHHAAAANNNNDDDDIIIIGGGGAAAARRRRHHHH 222233330000 CCCCRRRRMMMM----MMMM----33338888222211116666----2222000022226666 DDDDeeeecccciiiiddddeeeedddd oooonnnn::::

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

230

CRM-M-38216-2026

Decided on: 21.07.2026

Gurpreet @ Gopi

……Petitioner

Vs.

State of Punjab

..…Respondent

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:

Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. A.G., Punjab VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he wants to withdraw the present petition at this stage.

2. Ordered accordingly.

(VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 21.07.2026 Gaurav Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No GAURAV BHARDWAJ 2026.07.22 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead