Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/26685/2026 of GAGANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26685-2026 Date of decision :21.07.2026 GAGANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.S. Toor, Asstt.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-26685-2026

Date of decision :21.07.2026 GAGANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.S. Toor, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 in case bearing FIR No.145 dated 01.09.2022 registered under Sections 379-B, 323, 324, 342, 506, 149, 120-B IPC (corresponding Sections 303(2), 115(2), 118(1), 127(2), 351(2), 190, 61(2) of BNS) at Police Station Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), District Ludhiana. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in compliance of the order dated 11.05.2026, the petitioners have joined the investigation to the entire satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. A reply dated 20.07.2026 by way of an affidavit of Beant Kumar, PPS, Financial Crime, Addl. Charge, CAW & C-Cell, Ludhiana has been filed on behalf of the State by the learned counsel for the State. The same is taken on record. He on instructions admits the aforesaid fact JITESH LAL 2026.07.22 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-26685-2026

and submits that the petitioners is no more required for further investigation in the case. In view of aforesaid factual position, the interim order dated 11.05.2026 is made absolute. However, the petitioners shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and they shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Petition stands disposed of.

(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 21.07.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.07.22 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead