Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/34327/2026 of SATNAM SINGH AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 CRM-M-34327-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.07.2026 SATNAM SINGH AND OTHERS ....Petitioners V/s STATE OF PUNJAB .…Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Inderjeet Singh Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-34327-2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 21.07.2026

SATNAM SINGH AND OTHERS

....Petitioners

V/s

STATE OF PUNJAB

.…Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Present: Mr. Inderjeet Singh Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab.

*** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

Prayer in the present petition preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short the “BNSS”) is for the grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0107, dated 29.05.2026 under Sections 9, 10 and 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 registered at Police Station Sadar Moga, District Moga, Punjab.

2. On 22.06.2026, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Prayer in the present petition preferred by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short the “BNSS”) is for the grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0107 dated 29.05.2026 under Sections 9, 10, 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 registered at Police Station Sadar Moga, District Moga.

Heard.

Notice of motion.

Mr. Anil Shukla, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and prays for time to address arguments.

List on 16.07.2026. MANI KUMAR 2026.07.22 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-34327-2026 (O&M)

In the meantime, the petitioners are directed to join investigation. In the event of arrest, they shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to compliance of the provisions of Section 482(2) of BNSS.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the aforesaid order, the petitioners have duly joined investigation.

4. Learned counsel representing the State of Punjab, on instructions from SHO/Inspector Harwinder Singh, No.82/FDR, Police Station Sadar, Moga, who is present in the Court, submits that in compliance of the order dated 22.06.2026, the petitioners have duly joined investigation and their custodial interrogation are not required.

5. In view of the fact that petitioners have duly joined investigation and keeping in view the statement given by learned counsel representing the State of Punjab, the present petition is allowed. The order dated 22.06.2026 passed by this Court is made absolute, subject to compliance of the provisions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS.

(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)

JUDGE July 21, 2026 Mani Kumar

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No

Whether reportable:

Yes/No MANI KUMAR 2026.07.22 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead