Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/30826/2026 of SARABJEET KAUR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 21 July 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (205) CRM-M-30826-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-21.07.2026 SARABJEET KAUR … Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
CRM-M-30826-2026 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(205)
CRM-M-30826-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-21.07.2026
SARABJEET KAUR
… Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Navreet Kaur, AAG Punjab.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J
. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 (438 Cr.P.C.) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.69 dated 28.04.2026 under Section 108 of BNS (306 of IPC) registered at Police Station Mataur, District SAS Nagar, Punjab.
2. This Court, vide order dated 26.05.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of their arrest, they were ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.).
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 26.05.2026 passed by the Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation. POONAM 2026.07.23 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-30826-2026 (O&M) 2
4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Kawal Kumar states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation.
5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 26.05.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 21st July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.23 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document