Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/50038/2025 of NEHA Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 21 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105 Date of Decision:-21.07.2026 CRM-M-50038-2025 NEHA ......PETITIONER VS. STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT CRM-M-12406-2026 HARSH ALIAS HARSU ......PETITIONER VS. STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
105
Date of Decision:-21.07.2026
CRM-M-50038-2025
NEHA
......PETITIONER
VS.
STATE OF HARYANA
.....RESPONDENT
CRM-M-12406-2026
HARSH ALIAS HARSU
......PETITIONER
VS.
STATE OF HARYANA
.....RESPONDENT
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present:
Dr. Pankaj Nanhera, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sachin Jangra, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-50038-2025).
Mr. Tanvir S. Grewal, Advocate
for the petitioner (in CRM-M-12406-2026).
Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Addl. AG, Haryana.
Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the complainant.
****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
, J.(ORAL
)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned counsels for the petitioners wish to withdraw the present petitions.
2. Ordered accordingly.
3. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
4. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of the connected case. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) 21.07.2026 JUDGE Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2026.07.22 12:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh