Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/36309/2026 of SUMIT @ MANTRI Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 21 July 2026
HHHHIIIIGGGGHHHH CCCCOOOOUUUURRRRTTTT OOOOFFFF PPPPUUUUNNNNJJJJAAAABBBB AAAANNNNDDDD HHHHAAAARRRRYYYYAAAANNNNAAAA AAAATTTT CCCCHHHHAAAANNNNDDDDIIIIGGGGAAAARRRRHHHH 222222225555 CCCCRRRRMMMM----MMMM----33336666333300009999----2222000022226666 DDDDeeeecccciiiiddddeeeedddd oooonnnn::::
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
225
CRM-M-36309-2026
Decided on: 21.07.2026
Sumit @ Mantri
……Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana
..…Respondent
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate
for Mr. Siddarth, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that she wants to withdraw the present petition at this stage.
2. Ordered accordingly.
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 21.07.2026 Gaurav Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No GAURAV BHARDWAJ 2026.07.22 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment