Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8631/2026 of ANJALI BANSAL AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 21 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 124 Anjali Bansal and State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Nitin Katoria Mr. Sutikshan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Sahni, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) This petition of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN
124
Anjali Bansal
State of Harya
CORAM : H
Present: M
M M
** VIKRAM AG
Th of India for iss and liberty of to interfere an ensure the secu
2. Le majors have so law. However petitioners and (Annexures P record.
3. N
4. M on behalf of th
5. W present petitio the representat if so warranted with law.
July 21, 2026 vcgarg THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
CR
Da and another
V/s ana and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKR Mr. Nitin Katoria, Advocate for Mr. Sutikshan Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Amit Sahni, Addl. Advocate G ** GGARWAL, J (ORAL) his petition has been filed under suance of directions to responden the petitioners at the hands of r d harass the petitioners and to d urity of life and liberty of the pet earned counsel for the petitio olemnized marriage with their o , the private respondents are no d are extending threats to them -1 and P-2) of petitioners No. Notice of motion. Mr. Amit Sahni, Addl. Advocate G he official respondents. Without commenting upon the n is disposed of with a direction tion dated 16.07.2026 (Annexur d, as per the facts and circumstan
(V
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
AB AND HARYANA RH RWP-8631-2026 ate of Decision: 21.07.2026
…Petitioners
…Respondents RAM AGGARWAL for the petitioners.
General, Haryana. r Article 226 of the Constitution nts No.2 and 3 to protect the life respondents No.4 and 5 and not direct the official respondents to titioners. ners contends that they being own consent in accordance with ot accepting the marriage of the . The copies of 'Aadhaar' cards .1 and 2 have been placed on General, Haryana accepts notice validity of the marriage, the n to respondent No.2 to consider re P-4) and take requisite action, nces of the matter in accordance VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE d : Yes/No : Yes/No n e t o g h e s n e e r , e VIKAS CHANDER 2026.07.21 17.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document