Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/37833/2024 of YOGITA JAIN Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR on 20 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 289 CRM-M-37833-2024 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 YOGITA JAIN ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Gaurav Goel,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
289
CRM-M-37833-2024
Date of Decision: 20.07.2026
YOGITA JAIN
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
... RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:-
None for the petitioner.
Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate and
Mr. Tejinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2-Bank.
*****
H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the order dated 06.07.2024 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Ld. JMIC/Ludhiana in COMA-3877-2024 (date of Registration is 06.03.2024) titled as “ Union Bank of India Vs. Yogita Jain.
2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today.
3. A perusal of the record shows that the orders have been passed due to repeated non-appearance of the accused/petitioner before the trial Court. As such, I find no ground to interfere with the order dated 06.07.2024 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Ld. JMIC/Ludhiana.
4. Consequently, the present petition is hereby dismissed. 20.07.2026
(H.S.GREWAL) Anjal
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No ANJAL GUPTA 2026.07.22 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document