Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/27811/2026 of SUKHWINDER SINGH AND ANOTHERQ Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 20 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 324 CRM-M-27811-2026 Date of Decision:-20.07.2026 SUKHWINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER ......PETITIONERS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
324
CRM-M-27811-2026
Date of Decision:-20.07.2026
SUKHWINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER
......PETITIONERS
VS.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present:
Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate
for respondents No.2 and 3.
****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
, J.(ORAL
)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. As there is a gun-shot injury, the question of the quashing of FIR No.57 dated 11.07.2024 (Annexure P-1) under Section 109 of BNS, 2023 and sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Mallanwala, District Ferozepur, on the basis of a compromise does not arise, and therefore, the present petition stands dismissed.
2. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) 20.07.2026 JUDGE Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2026.07.21 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh