Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/39476/2026 of SANDEEP SHARMA Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 20 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sandeep Sharma State of Haryana Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Uploading:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-39476
IN T IN T IN T IN T
Sandeep Sha
State of Hary
Date of Deci Date of Deci Date of Deci Date of Deci Date of Uplo Date of Uplo Date of Uplo Date of Uplo
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
Present Present Present Present:
SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO
Bhartiya Nag concession o later on, in F 316(5), 318(4 Sadar, Distr commission Prevention o
2. perusal of the passed in CR CR CR CR 6-2026
HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGAR CHANDIGAR CHANDIGAR CHANDIGAR
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-39476
39476-2 arma
versus yana
ision: sion: ision: sion: July 20
July 20, 2026
oading: oading: oading: oading: July 20
July 20, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Se ***** OEL OEL OEL OEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present 2nd petition has been f garik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( of anticipatory bail to the petitio FIR No.836 dated 30.10.2025, re 4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of th rict Karnal since earlier antic of offences ibid, but later on S f Corruption Act have been adde After hearing learned counsel e record, it is borne out that earl RM RM RM RM-M-74058 74058 74058 74058-2025
2025, the petition
B AND HARYANA AT B AND HARYANA AT B AND HARYANA AT B AND HARYANA AT RH RH RH RH
....Petitioner
....Respondent MEET GOEL MEET GOEL MEET GOEL MEET GOEL the petitioner. enior DAG Haryana. filed under Section 482 of the (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of oner, in addition Sections added egistered under Sections 316(2), he BNS, 2023, at Police Station cipatory bail was granted for Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) of the ed by the prosecution. for the rival parties and upon lier, vide order dated 31.12.2025 ner was afforded the concession
r t e f d , n r e n n MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-39476
39476-2026
of anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court for commission of offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the BNS, 2023, in the FIR in question. It has been pleaded that subsequently, the police has invoked Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, on 20.02.2026.
3. It is not in dispute before this Court that the petitioner has not misused the concession of anticipatory bail, afforded to him earlier, in respect of offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the BNS, 2023. The occasion for the petitioner to file the present petition has arisen only on account of subsequent addition of Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in the FIR in question.
4. Keeping in view the factual milieu of the case in hand, the petition in hand is allowed allowed allowed allowed. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail qua offences punishable under Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as well in the FIR in question, subject to his joining investigation and cooperating therein, as and when required, and further subject to his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly influence any witness or tamper with the evidence.
5. This order should not be treated as a “blanket” order. It will not be read as granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence. MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-39476
39476-2026
6. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 or upon showing any other sufficient cause.
7. Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.
(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
July 20, 2026
mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment