Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/21787/2026 of NARESH KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 20 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 141 CWP-21787-2026 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 Naresh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Ishnoor Singh, Advocate
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
141
CWP-21787-2026
Date of Decision: 20.07.2026
Naresh Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present:
Mr. Ishnoor Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sourabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate and
Mr. Arnav Goel, Advocate
for respondent No.4-MC Ganaur.
*****
DEEPAK SIBAL
, J (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been preferred for issuance of directions to respondent No.2 to convene a meeting for electing Vice-President of Municipal Committee, Ganaur which post has been lying vacant since 10.01.2025.
2. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the afore meeting shall be convened by respondent No.2 within one month from today, in accordance with law.
3. The afore statement made by learned State counsel satisfies learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Disposed of.
(DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 20.07.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.21 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh