Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/39479/2026 of GURVINDER KAUR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 20 July 2026
(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 152 CRM-M-39479-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.07.2026 GURVINDER KAUR PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision: 20.07.2026
GURVINDER KAUR
PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present:
Mr. Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG Haryana.
***
Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Prayer in the petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023 is for directing official respondents to: i) Investigate the matter and register the FIR against the accused persons; ii) Direct the Naib Tehsildar (Deputy Commissioner), Kurukshetra to restore possession of the petitioners and their family after their illegal dispossession and; iii) Restrain the respondents from interfering in the petitioner’s peaceful possession.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was permanently residing in a residential house situated in Village Kotra Khas, Tehsil Jagadhari, District Yamunanagar for the last 25 years. She temporarily shifted with her husband to Kota for education of her daughter and taking undue advantage of her absence, respondent, in connivance with the revenue officials, succeeded in getting the property ID of front portion of the house, including the main gate and verandah, recorded in his name. Now, private respondents were extending threats, abuses to the petitioner, whenever she HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.07.21 17:22 I agree to specified portions of this document visited the village and were intimidating her. The matter was reported to the police, but no action was taken.
3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only.
4. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that enquiry on petitioner’s representations was underway and the needful would be done in due course.
5. Considering the response of the State, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2-SHO, Block Bilaspur, District Yamunanagar to decide the representations dated 08.10.2024, 21.04.2025, 17.12.2025, 17.06.2026 (Annexures P-8 to P-11) submitted by petitioner within a period of one month from today, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required.
6. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representations, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law.
7. Regarding restoration of possession and restraint order, the petitioner is at liberty to seek redressal through competent civil Court.
8. The petition stands disposed of.
9. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE 20.07.2026 HS.CHAUHAN Whether Speaking/Reasoned :
Yes/No Whether Reportable :
Yes/No
HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.07.21 17:22 I agree to specified portions of this document