Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8592/2026 of GARIMA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 20 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8592-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 20.07.2026 Garima and another ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Anil Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate, Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8592-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision:- 20.07.2026
Garima and another
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:-
Mr. Anil Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate,
Mr. Dharam Pal Saini, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, Addl. AG, Haryana.
* * * *
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the official respondents to ensure protection of the life and personal liberty of the petitioners from the illegal acts and threats allegedly extended by the private respondents and further directing the official respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 14.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) submitted by the petitioners, in accordance with law.
2. Notice of motion.
3. On the asking of Court, Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, learned Addl. AG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and assures that respondent No. 2- Superintendent of Police, Gurugram, would look into the petitioners’ representation dated 14.07.2026 (Annexure P-3). AMODH SHARMA 2026.07.20 19:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRWP-8592-2026 (O&M)
4. In view of the above, respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Gurugram is directed to look into the representation and decide the same on the basis of threat perception felt by the petitioners and if the threat perception is found to be true then the protection as admissible in law shall be provided. In case, the concerned Officer is of the view that no protection is required, then a speaking order shall be passed and communicated to the petitioners.
5. Disposed of.
6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL)
JUDGE 20.07.2026 Amodh Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned √Yes/No Whether reportable √Yes/No
AMODH SHARMA 2026.07.20 19:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document