Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/6096/2026 of PARGAN SINGH ALIAS PARGAT SINGH AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER on 20 July 2026
(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 163 CRM-M-6096-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.07.2026 Pargan Singh alias Pargat Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. GREWAL *****
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
163
CRM-M-6096-2026 (O&M)
Date of decision: 20.07.2026
Pargan Singh alias Pargat Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. GREWAL
*****
Present:
Mr. Fatehjeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Gursharan Singh, Advocate
for respondent No.2.
****
H. S. GREWAL
, J. (ORAL)
CRM-27822-2026
The present application has been filed seeking preponement of the date of hearing in the main petition, which is presently fixed for 17.09.2026, to an earlier date.
In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and main petition is taken up on board today itself.
Main Case
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS,2023/ 482 of Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR No. 122 dated 14.12.2024 under Sections 329(3), 324(5), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Kalanaur, District Gurdaspur (Annexure P-1) along with all consequential proceedings, on the basis of compromise effected between parties. ANIL KUMAR
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR is outcome of a misunderstanding which has now been resolved and with the intervention of the respectables of the Society, the matter has indeed been compromised between the parties. He has referred to the compromise dated 22.01.2026 in this regard at Annexure P-2.
3. This Court vide order dated 10.03.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurdaspur and got their statements recorded. A copy of report dated 19.05.2026 has been submitted to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
5. Learned State counsel as well as the counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
7. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
8. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 122 dated 14.12.2024 under Sections 329(3), 324(5), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station ANIL KUMAR
Kalanaur, District Gurdaspur (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioners are hereby quashed. July 20, 2026
(H. S. GREWAL ) anil
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No ANIL KUMAR