Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/8244/2026 of SALMAN AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 20 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 145 CRWP-8244-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 SALMAN AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners V/s STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .…Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Ms. Neha Bindal, Advocate for Mr. Avtar Singh,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-8244-2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 20.07.2026

SALMAN AND ANOTHER

....Petitioners

V/s

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

.…Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Present: Ms. Neha Bindal, Advocate for Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

*** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

This petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 10 and not to harass and implicate the petitioners in any false criminal case and also directing the official respondents to decide the representation dated 09.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are in a live-in-relationship. The private respondents are not accepting the said relationship and are extending threats to them. The copies of 'Aadhaar' cards (Annexures P-1 and P-2) of petitioners No.1 and 2 have been placed on record.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. Amit Sahni, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. MANI KUMAR 2026.07.21 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-8244-2026 (O&M)

5. Dr. Kiran Pal Singh, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.4 to 7 and has filed his power of attorney, which is taken on record.

6. Heard.

7. Without commenting upon the validity of the relationship, and further keeping in view the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Yash Pal and another Versus State of Haryana and others (CRWP No.4660 of 2021, decided on 09.09.2024), the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 09.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) and take requisite action, if so warranted, as per the facts and circumstances of the matter in accordance with law.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)

JUDGE July 20, 2026 Mani Kumar

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No

Whether reportable:

Yes/No MANI KUMAR 2026.07.21 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead