Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/39584/2026 of JAGTAR SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 20 July 2026
Kaur and another State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, 1. direction to off 02.04.2026, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 191(3), 190 of BNS Police Station Lehra, District having failed to invoke Sections 118(2) and
CRM-M-395
Baljeet Kaur
State of Pun
CORAM: H
Present:
Shalini Sing
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. direction to o 02.04.2026, Police Station having failed
2. was lodged respondents. invoked only moved to S 173(4) BNS
3.
4. accepts notic ASI Satgur S 584-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA
r and another
VERSUS njab and others
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, DAG, Punj
*** gh Nagpal, J.(Oral) The petition under Section 528 official respondents to transfer in under Sections 126(2), 115(2) n Lehra, District Sangrur, respon d to invoke Sections 118(2) and 1 Learned counsel for the petition on complaint of petitioners, Grievous injuries were caused y Section 115(2) of BNS. Rep enior Superintendent of Police but no action was taken thereon. Notice of motion to official resp Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, DAG, Pu ce on behalf of the official respon Singh, submits that there was no
F PUNJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRM-M-39584-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.07.2026
Petitioners
Respondents LINI SINGH NAGPAL for the petitioners. jab.
8 of BNSS has been filed for a nvestigation of FIR No.83 dated , 351(2), 191(3), 190 of BNS, ndent No.4/Investigation Officer 117(4) of BNS. ners submits that aforesaid FIR regarding assault by private to the petitioners but the police presentation, Annexure P-7 was e, Sangrur in terms of Section . pondents. unjab, who is present in Court, ndents. He, on instructions from o opinion of the doctor declaring )
s s
a d , r R e e s n , m g KAPIL 2026.07.20 19:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-395
the injury gr prayed for di
5. U.P. and ot Hemant Yas the High Cou first informa High Courts be able to d Therefore, th the Magistrat Magistrate w information r he can also m
6. unfair or tain to the petiti accordance w
7. 20.07.2026 Kapil 584-2026 (O&M) rievous, therefore only Section ismissal of present petition. Hon'ble Supreme Court of Ind thers, (2008) 2 SCC 409, and hwant Dhage and others, (2016 urts are flooded with writ petition ation report or praying for prop entertain such writ petitions, th do any other work except dea he complainant must avail of hi te concerned under Section 156( will ensure, if prima facie he is s report and also ensure a proper monitor the investigation. There is no reason to believe t nted. Accordingly, the petition is ioners to avail alternative re with law.
Pending applications, if any, stan Whether Speaking/Reason Whether Reportable :
115(2) BNS was invoked. He dia in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe v.
6) 6 SCC 277, has observed that ns praying for registration of the per investigation and that if the hey will be flooded and may not aling with such writ petitions. is alternate remedy to approach
(3) Cr.P.C and if he does so, the satisfied, registration of the first investigation in the matter, and that investigation of the case is s hereby disposed of with liberty emedies available to them, in nd disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE oned :
Yes/No
Yes/No e f
t e e t . h e t d s y n
) KAPIL 2026.07.20 19:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document