Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/24293/2026 of KAMALJIT SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 20 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 207 AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24293-2026 Date of decision: 20.07.2026 KAMALJIT SINGH ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Saurav Sharma and Mr. Himanshu Khanna, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-24293-2026
Date of decision: 20.07.2026
KAMALJIT SINGH
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Saurav Sharma and
Mr. Himanshu Khanna, Advocates for the petitioner.
Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab.
Dr. Parminder Kaur, Advocate for the complainant.
****
H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 438 of Cr.P.C) in case FIR No.115 dated 31.03.2026 under Sections 308 (2), 61(2) of BNS (earlier Sections 420 & 120-B of IPC) registered at Police Station Kharar District SAS Nagar.
2. This Court, vide order dated 04.05.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of his arrest, he was ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.).
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 04.05.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined and RENU RAWAT 2026.07.21 09.20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh cooperated with the investigation.
4. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the in- vestigation and is not required for further custodial interrogation.
5. Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
6. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 04.05.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. However, it is clarified that the investigating authority on addition of an offence or offences may not proceed to arrest the accused/petitioner, but for arresting the accused/petitioner on such addition of offence or offences it needs to obtain an order to arrest the accused/petitioners from the Court which had granted the bail in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sumit Vs State of U.P. and Another, Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026, decided on 09.02.2026.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 20.07.2026 (H.S.GREWAL) renu
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.21 09.20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh