Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/39124/2026 of MANJEET SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER on 20 July 2026
M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (169) CRM-M-39124-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 20.07.2026 Manjeet Singh and anr. …... Petitioner(s) V/s State of Punjab and anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Vishal Sharma
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(169) CRM-M-39124-2026 (O & M)
Date of decision: 20.07.2026 Manjeet Singh and anr. …... Petitioner(s) V/s State of Punjab and anr. ...Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Vishal Sharma (Vasudeva), Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. M.S. Toor, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Sumit, Advocate, for the respondent No.2. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI,
J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed for quashing of an FIR No.286 dated 30.06.2026 under Sections 109, 3(5) BNS (Sections 307, 34 IPC) and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Kharar, District SAS Nagar, Punjab and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 13.07.2026 (Annexure P-2), entered into between the parties.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that there is no gun shot injury on the person of the injured.
3. The learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, while referring to the MLR which is a part of the record, states that injury No.2 is a burn abrasion which shows that it has been caused by gun-powder. SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.21 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
4. The question of quashing of the FIR under Section 307 IPC (Section 109 BNS) where the injury has been caused by a firearm does not arise.
5. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed.
6. The pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. July 20, 2026 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.21 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh