Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8608/2026 of RIYA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 20 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8608-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 20.07.2026 Riya and another ...Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Punjab and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Hemant Passi, Advocate, for Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8608-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision:- 20.07.2026
Riya and another
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:-
Mr. Hemant Passi, Advocate,
for Mr. Atinder Pal Singh, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Mr. Gurpartap Singh, AAG, Punjab.
* * * *
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the official respondents to ensure protection of the life and personal liberty of the petitioners from the illegal acts and threats allegedly extended by the private respondents as the petitioners want to live together in a live in relationship and want to marry with each other after petitioner No. 2 attains the age of marriage, but they are facing hard opposition from the family members of petitioner No. 1.
2. Notice of motion.
3. On the asking of Court, Mr. Gurpartap Singh, learned AAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and assures that respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran, would look into the petitioners’ representation dated 23.06.2026 (Annexure P-3). AMODH SHARMA 2026.07.20 19:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRWP-8608-2026 (O&M)
4. In view of the above, respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran is directed to look into the representation and decide the same on the basis of threat perception felt by the petitioners and if the threat perception is found to be true then the protection as admissible in law shall be provided. In case, the concerned Officer is of the view that no protection is required, then a speaking order shall be passed and communicated to the petitioners.
5. Disposed of.
6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL)
JUDGE 20.07.2026 Amodh Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned √Yes/No Whether reportable √Yes/No
AMODH SHARMA 2026.07.20 19:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document