Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/39095/2026 of ATMA RAM AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 20 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (142) CRM-M-39095-2026 Atma Ram and another ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and others ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 20.07.2026 Date of uploading: 20.07.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. S.S.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-39095-2026

Atma Ram and another

……Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab and others

……Respondent(s)

Decided on : 20.07.2026

Date of uploading: 20.07.2026

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present:

Mr. S.S. Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Hemant Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab.

*****

Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral):

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus:

“It is therefore respectfully submitted that interim bail may kindly be granted to the petitioners in FIR No.199 dated 17.10.2021 (Annexure P-1), registered at Police Station Nihal Singh Wala, District Moga, under Sections 302 IPC (103 BNS), 452 IPC (333 BNS), 364 IPC (140 BNS), 148 IPC (191 (3) BNS) and 149 IPC (190 BNS) (section 120-B IPC (section 61(2) BNS) added in Challan) on humanitarian ground for a week to attend the bhog ceremony Smt. Jatti Bai (Scheduled for 25.07.2026) of the mother and grandmother of the petitioners who has died on 13.07.2026, in the interest of justice and equity.

It is further prayed that further directions may kindly be issued to respondents to temporary release the petitioners to attend the bhog ceremony of the mother and grandmother of the petitioners who has died on 13.07.2026, in the interest of justice and equity.”

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.20 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-39095-2026

2. Faced with the situation that the petitioners have not approached the concerned Sessions Court, in the first instance, seeking the relief (s) claimed herein, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition in hand, so as to enable the petitioners to approach the concerned Sessions Court in the first instance.

3. Ordered accordingly.

4. Needless to say that, in case the petitioners do so, the concerned Sessions Court shall take an expeditious decision on the plea raised by the petitioners, keeping in view the exigency involved. It is, however, made clear that observations made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the plea likely to be raised by the petitioners and same shall be ratiocinated upon by the concerned Court on merits thereof.

(SUMEET GOEL) July 20, 2026

JUDGE Naveen

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.20 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead