Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/6458/2026 of ANKUSH Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 20 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 CRM-M-6458-2026 ANKUSH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT DATE OF DECISION: 20.07.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 20.07.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Gourav Verma, Advocate and Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advocate for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210
CRM-M-6458-2026
ANKUSH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT DATE OF DECISION: 20.07.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 20.07.2026
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Gourav Verma, Advocate and Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr. Prikshit Thakur, Advocate and Mr. Kirpal Singh Thakur, Advocate for the complainant. ….. SUMEET GOEL
, J (ORAL)
Present 3rd petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0209 dated 23.06.2023 under Sections 148, 149, 302, 120-B of IPC and Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand at this stage. Ordered accordingly.
(SUMEET GOEL) 20.07.2026
JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2026.07.20 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document